Folder 6 - Forensic DNA Phenotyping
When conventional STR profiles obtained from crime scene biological samples do yield any matches with profiles from known subjects, criminal investigators may benefit from any other information about the donor that may be discernable from the genetic interrogation of the original biological sample. Whilst such information is not relevant for evidential purposes, it is capable of providing valuable intelligence that may advance a criminal investigation. This emerging technology is the subject of scientific interest and of ethical, legal and social commentary. This folder contains instances of the latter from a variety of jurisdictions and policy perspective.
Risch et al. (2002) Categorization of humans in biomedical research: genes, race and disease
Tishkorff and Kidd (2004) Implications of Biogeography of Human Populations for ‘Race’ and Medicine
National Human Genome Research Institute (2005) The Use of Racial, Ethnic, and Ancestral Categories in Human Genetics Research
Haga (2006) Policy Implications of Defining Race and More by Genome Profiling
Wolinsky (2006) Genetic Genealogy Goes Global
Bolnick (2007) The Science and Business of Genetic Ancestry Testing
The American Society of Human Genetics (2008) Ancestry Testing Statement
Koops & Schellekens (2008) Forensic DNA Phenotyping: Regulatory Issues
Fullwiley (2008) The Biologistical Construction of Race: `Admixture' Technology and the New Genetic Medicine
Lee et al (2008) The ethics of characterizing difference: guiding principles on using racial categories in human genetics.
Häyry (2008) The Historical Idea of a Better Race.
M’charek (2008) Contrasts and Comparisons: Three Practices of Forensic Investigation
Kayser & Schneider (2009) DNA-based prediction of human externally visible characteristics in forensics: Motivations, scientific challenges, and ethical considerations.
Wall Street Journal (2009) To Sketch a Thief
M'charek (2010) Fragile differences, relational effects: Stories about the materiality of race and sex.
Royal et al. (2010) Inferring Genetic Ancestry: Opportunities, Challenges, and Implications
M'charek at al (2011) Bracketing off population does not advance ethical reflection on EVCs: A reply to Kayser and Schneider
Kayser & de Knijff (2011) Improving human forensics through advances in genetics, genomics and molecular biology.
Kidd et al. (2011) Analyses of a set of 128 ancestry informative single-nucleotide polymorphisms in a global set of 119 population samples.
Kayser & Schneider (2012) Reply to ‘‘Bracketing off population does not advance ethical reflection on EVCs: A reply to Kayser and Schneider’’ by A. M’charek, V. Toom, and B. Prainsack.
Amorim (2012) Opening the DNA black box: demythologizing forensic genetics.
Sankar (2012) Forensic DNA Phenotyping
M'Charek (2013) Beyond Fact or Fiction: On the Materiality of Race in Practice.
M'charek et al. (2013) Topologies of race: Doing territory, population and identity in Europe.
Murphy (2013) Legal and ethical issues in forensic DNA Phenotyping.
Branicki et al. (2014) A new dimension of the forensic DNA expertise – the need for training experts and expertise recipients
Duster (2014) Ancestry Testing and DNA: Uses, Limits – and Caveat Emptor
Financial Times (2015) DNA: the next frontier in forensics
Kayser (2015) Forensic DNA Phenotyping: Predicting human appearance from crime scene material for investigative purposes.
Phillips (2015) Forensic genetic analysis of bio-geographical ancestry.
Schneider (2016) Audio Interview on forensic DNA Phenotyping in Germany with "Deutsche Welle International".
Tutton et al (2015) Importing forensic technologies into border control: genetic ancestry and isotope testing in the UKBA’s Human Provenance Pilot Project
Toom et al (2016) Approaching ethical, legal and social issues of emerging forensic DNA phenotyping (FDP) technologies comprehensively: Reply to ‘Forensic DNA phenotyping: Predicting human appearance from crime scene material for investigative purposes’ by Manfred Kayser.
Articles in Polish language: